|
≈ 0.000
Bias-adjusted effect (d)
|
63.5
BF₀₁ for null
|
91
Field studies
|
98.4%
Pr(zero effect)
|
63.5× more consistent with zero effect than any effect at all.
"After accounting for publication bias and model uncertainty, the data strongly favor a zero average effect. On average, behavioral interventions without incentives on households and individuals are unlikely to deliver material climate benefits."
Shifting climate policy toward incentives and structural interventions appears more promising than standalone behavioral nudges directed at citizens.
References
Nisa, C. F., Bélanger, J. J., Schumpe, B. M., et al. (2019). Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change. Nature Communications, 10, 4545.
Maier, M., Bartoš, F., Stanley, T. D., Shanks, D. R., Harris, A. J. L., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias. PNAS, 119(31). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200300119
Bartoš, F., Maier, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2025). Robust Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis: Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of dependent effect sizes. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9tgp2_v1
Hardaker, A., Asanov, I., Bartoš, F., & Bruns, S. B. (2026). No evidence that non-incentivized behavioral interventions effectively mitigate climate change after adjusting for publication bias. PNAS Nexus. pgag150. [Link]
RSS Feed